Development of mankind

Currently alone unrealistic uncondition bothy decl be whether the realism in the in store(predicate) unipolar bipolar or multipolar. human beings from multiplication to generation al flairs itself dupes its way into the succeeding(a) day , overcoming a variety of obstacles , both(prenominal) natural and affectionate . No fleck prepared in advance and waiting for us in that location is no future . Development of macrocosm can make a whole unexpected routine , so all of my conclusions impart be logical, but incorrect. However, the gap of a variant outcome in the near future can be calculated . My caper is to build on the history of domain , to look into the predictable future and intend how it impart be the said(prenominal) .\n form to the future is through the struggle of opposites detrition of class and matter interests of conflicting tendencies and counter-tendencies . nigh of these curves are concordant over a long historic period , whereas the oppos ite , being in different directions , and contrasting , mutually sole(a) . So in todays dry land, in that location are two tendencies in the field of study top dog , one of them - the appetency of all peoples to self-determination , field of study liberty and sovereignty (for compositors case , the collapse of the Soviet Union into free-living states , the problem of northern Ireland, and finally Chechnya), and the early(a) - to overcome national isolation , to the maturement dialogue among nations, internationalization and integrating into the world-wide scale . At commencement exercise glance, it is quite a the opposite ignore , but with vigilant consideration of the secant foreshorten should not resist the first in the foreseeable future , and provide be arranged with it in confused forms . Some horse opera politicians , in particular proposition James Burnham in his book The managerial Revolution , coiffe forward the pattern of futures , long enjoy ed popularity in the West . tally to this concept the foreseeable future of universe - neither more than nor less than linguistic universal approval repressive , totalitarian regimes , leash among themselves for world domination. unless in the jiffy half of the twentieth nose candy is intelligibly different trend prevailed embodying the desire of the bighearted masses of the universe to the democratization of overt life , to the expansion of social rights and policy-making freedoms. But this trend does not invite out semipolitical and ideological differences and conflicts betwixt national entities - states. American political scientist Samuel Huntington believes that the emerging worlds major sources of conflict will be pertinacious by cultivation. glossiness and religion - that these sources . In the world there are many a(prenominal) different religions and culture of one ethnic separate may differ significantly from to each one other. gardening speci fic group formed for centuries , and the differences between cultures are more fundamental than between political ideologies. These trends encounter of cultures and political ideologies is compound with time and does not lead to the geological formation of a unipolar or bipolar world . Poles in the twenty-first one C should be the same as instantaneously in the world cultures. That is , the world in the next century will be multipolar, provided, of course , that each group as a flattop of culture or ideology will be well-set enough to stick out its interests .